Appellants’ Brief In Oneida Appeals Commission Docket 14-AC-018 Regarding Illegal Caucus & Unlawfully Scheduled Election To Address Oneida Business Committee Vacancy

• February 2, 2015 Appellants’ Brief in Oneida Appeals Commission Docket #14-AC-018, Cornelius, Debraska, Dodge & Graham v. Oneida Business Committee, Oneida Election Board & Oneida Law Office

Excerpt:

Interestingly, in the November 14, 2014 edition of the Kalihwisaks, one of the Respondents, OBC Council Member Tehassi Hill, concedes that the Petitioners/Appellants are correct in his column of that issue’s OBC Forum by stating: “Another irregularity was the vote to reconsider option B (election process). Normally we would have had two votes in the reconsideration process. The first vote would be to see if there is support to readdress the previous action to vote down option B. If that vote succeeded, then we would revote on option B. We only voted once and it was recognized as the actual vote for option B. I feel this action was out of order.”

See also:

• January 6, 2015 Appellate Body Initial Review Decision, Docket # 14-AC-018, Cornelius, Debraska, Dodge & Graham v. OBC, Oneida Election Board & Oneida Law Office

• December 31, 2014, Appeal of December 15, 2014, Trial Body Decision in Docket No. 14-TC-190 & Request for TRO/Injunction Against January 10, 2015, Special Election to Address Oneida Business Committee Vacancy

• GTC’s Real Choices: SPEND $700,000 Or SAVE $500,000

• The Reasoning To Require A New GTC Meeting To Address The Oneida Business Committee Vacancy

• Oneida Business Committee Chair Tina Danforth’s Disregard For Law & The Will Of The Oneida People

• Oneida Chief Counsel Jo Anne House’s Disregard For Law & The Will Of The Oneida People